Aurel MOHAN
Professor Dr. Mohan Aurel-George, was born in the city of Bucharest on 27.04.1983, graduated from the Oltea Doamna General School, after which he graduated from the Mihai Eminescu National College in 2001. He attended the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Oradea, specializing in General Medicine in the period 2002-2008, after which he was a resident doctor in the clinical department of Neurosurgery at the Oradea County Emergency Clinical Hospital between 2009-2015. In 2014, he obtained the title of doctor in medical sciences at the doctoral school of the Carol Davilla University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Bucharest.
He began his university career in 2009, obtaining through a competition the position of university trainer in the Department of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea. In 2016, he took the exam for the position of Lecturer at the University of Oradea - Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, and at the same time, from the position of specialist neurosurgeon, he became the head doctor/coordinator of the operating room at the Oradea County Emergency Clinical Hospital.
In 2019, he becomes Associate Professor at the University of Oradea, and in 2021 he takes the primary exam, thus becoming a primary neurosurgeon also at the Oradea Neurosurgery Clinic.
In 2022, he takes the exam for the position of Full Professor at Oradea University and is appointed Secretary of State at the Bucharest Ministry of Health, where he begins his work between January 2022 until February 2023.
In October 2023, he is elected in the position of Head of Department of Surgical Disciplines, at the University of Oradea – Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy.
Currently, Dr. Mohan Aurel-George leads the residency program at the Oradea Neurosurgery Clinic, as a University Professor and primary neurosurgeon and is the coordinator of the Oradea County Emergency Clinical Hospital.
Abstract
Customized cranioplasty using cranial repair system implants from biomaterials and recovery for the patients after severe traumatic brain injury - case study and report.
Ghiurău N. Adrian1, Mohan G. Aurel2, Vlad S. Valentin3 ,Herciu Alexandru4
1) University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Surgical Disciplines, Romania, ghiurau.adrian@yahoo.com,
2) University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Surgical Disciplines, Romania,
3) University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Surgical Disciplines, Romania,
4) University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Surgical Disciplines, Romania.
Introduction
Cranioplasty is the surgical repair of a bone defect in the skull resulting from a injury or a previous operation, such as decompressive craniectomy. Our paper presents a study regarding post-traumatic cranioplasty using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants, and furthermore two case reports and after the cranioplasty the evolution and recovery of the patients.
Experimental.
Throughout the history many types of materials were used in performing a cranioplasty. With the biomedical technology evolving, new materials are now available to be used by the neurosurgeons. The implant allows the replacement of the bone gaps of the patient's cranial skeleton. The implant is modeled and sized to fit the individual anatomy of each patient. The implant is designed with a software, after receiving the patient's CT scan and made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK). The implant is attached to the native bone with self-locking plates or fixed using standard cranial fixation systems or using standard titanium screws.
Results and Discussion.
The polyetheretherketone(Peek) implants were used. Biomaterials implants are a safe and time effective way to reconstruct cranial defects following severe traumatic brain injury. Among the advantages of polyetheretherketone implants is their‘s nonferromagnetic capacity which permits the safe examination in magnetic resonance imaging high field, useful for long-term follow-up. Prefabricated Peek implants were effective for cranioplasty, reducing surgical time, surgical blood loss and technical simplicity. There were no infected implants and none of the patients required a second surgery.
Conclusions.
Biomaterials represent a tremendous leap forward in the surgical management of skull deformities. Biomaterials implants are extremly effective for cranioplasty. These implants also contribute in a special way to the social reintegration of these patients, the psychological component having an essential role in their recovery. The materials and techniques used in cranioplasty are in a continuous development and evolution. These implants also contribute as an psychological component having an essential role in their recovery and helping the patients to return to normal activities.
BiomMedD' 2026
All rights reserved © copyright by biommedd.ro